انت هنا الان : شبكة جامعة بابل > موقع الكلية > نظام التعليم الالكتروني > مشاهدة المحاضرة
الكلية كلية الاداب
القسم قسم الاجتماع
المرحلة 1
أستاذ المادة موح عراك عليوي الزغيبي
6/23/2011 9:00:17 AM
One person or group forcing its will is called coercion . To a large extent all forms of coercion rest on the threat of the use of physical force or violence . But coercion is usually much more subtle than the open use of threat or violence . Love of parent , respect for one s national flag , and fear of loneliness can all be used as weapons of coercion too.
Like conflict , coercion is viewed negatively and associated with slavery . But coercion also has positive social functions . The threat of coercion often underlies the teaching of social values , what is right and what is wrong.
A person acting in a certain way towards another for the purpose of receiving a reward or return is engaged in an exchange relationships . Most employer-employee relationships are of this type. The employee behaves according to the wishes of the employer and is rewarded with salary.
The rewards do not have to be monetary or material . Subjective emotional rewards from the basis for many social exchange relationships for example , when a person acts for receiving gratitude As sociologists such as George Holmes and Peter Blau have pointed out , exchange relationships based on gratitude is very significant in people s lives . Underlying many action (such as making change for a stranger , helping on old person across the street, or sending a small gift to a friend who is ill ) is an expected return of love and gratitude.
The exchange relationship is also important in more intimate types of interaction . One person s love for another is not based solely on an expected return of that love , but it will not survive if the person never receives any love in exchange The absorption of the culture and social structure of an incoming group into the dominant society is referred to as assimilation . Two forms of assimilation may be noted . In one form new immigrants change their socio-cultural structure to conform to that of the dominant culture and society . The second form of assimilation - the true melting pot -involvess an intermixing or blending of the dominant culture with the sub-cultures of the immigrants in such a way that a new culture results.
Assimilation occurs more readily in some condition than in others . It is more likely to take place easily and quickly when a minority group is similar to the dominant society both culturally and biologically.
While assimilation means a social and cultural merging , amalgamation refers to the biological merging of an ethnic or a racial group with the native population . Some amalgamation always occurs when two groups live together , but it is rare for amalgamation to be the dominant pattern of acceptance.
True amalgamation can be seen in Hawaii in polynesia , where Caucasians , Negroes and Monogloids have intermarried so frequently that the three races have partly melted into a single group.
Amalgamation is not necessarily a feasible solution to problems of intergroup relations even if it could be carried out
follow ....
COMPREHENSION
1- What is coercion ?
2- Why is coercion viewed negatively ?
3- Define "assimilation" ?
4 - What are the two forms of assimilation ?
5- Which is the more dominant pattern of acceptance , assimilation or amalgamation ?
المادة المعروضة اعلاه هي مدخل الى المحاضرة المرفوعة بواسطة استاذ(ة) المادة . وقد تبدو لك غير متكاملة . حيث يضع استاذ المادة في بعض الاحيان فقط الجزء الاول من المحاضرة من اجل الاطلاع على ما ستقوم بتحميله لاحقا . في نظام التعليم الالكتروني نوفر هذه الخدمة لكي نبقيك على اطلاع حول محتوى الملف الذي ستقوم بتحميله .
|