انت هنا الان : شبكة جامعة بابل > موقع الكلية > نظام التعليم الالكتروني > مشاهدة المحاضرة

Epidemiological studies

الكلية كلية طب الاسنان     القسم التقويم والاطفال وطب الاسنان الوقائي     المرحلة 3
أستاذ المادة لمياء عبد الخالق العزاوي       14/11/2017 20:41:15

Epidemiological Studies
Dr.Lamya Al-Azzzawi
Ph.D. Community Dentistry
Department of Pediatric, Orthodontic ,and Preventive Dentistry (P.O.P)
Types Of Epidemiological studies
1.Observational epidemiology 1.Descriptive study a. Case- report , Case
series, and Incidence, 2. Analytical study

a. Cohort study
b. Case control study
2..Experimental epidemiology a. Randomized control trials
b. Field trials
Clinical trials
c. Community trials
Descriptive study
• This type of study considered the first phase of any epidemiological investigation. Descriptive study designs include:

Case Reports
It generally describes an injury or injuries to one or two individuals that have been identified in a medical situation.
Generally report a new or unique finding.
• e.g. previous undescribed disease.
e.g. unexpected link between diseases.
e.g. unpredicted new therapeutic effect.

Case Series
In a case series, several events are described.
These events usually have been observed over a set period of time (such as one year) and are identified from one reporting source (e.g. a hospital)
• Experience of a group of patients with a similar diagnosis.
• Assesses prevalent disease.
• Cases may be identified from a single or multiple sources.
• Generally report on new condition
Prevalence or Incidence study
• Prevalence or Incidence study
This type of studies commonly used for comparison between two or more or between the same population ?
Analytical studies
• It is most often used to determine the etiology of the disease

• Case-Control studies represent one form of analytic study that provides information on the relationship between causal factors and injuries

Case-Control Study
Strengths
• Less expensive and time consuming
• Efficient for studying rare diseases
Limitations
• Inappropriate when disease outcome for a specific exposure is not known at start of study
• Exposure measurements taken after disease occurrence
• Disease status can influence selection of subjects
•Cohort study. This study is conducted on general population that is followed through time to see which members develop the disease .
The sequence of cause and effect may be clearly seen in prospective study
Time frame of Studies
• Retrospective Study - “to look back”, looks back in time to study events that have previously happened

Study begins here
Prospective Study - looks forward, looks to the future, examines future events, follows a condition, concern or disease into the future.

Differences between case –control and Cohort studies.

Case- control study
• Disease has already occurred
• Presence of exposure in cases and controls compared
• Relatively easy to carry out
• Useful for rare cases
• Relatively less costly
• No failures
• Can only have one outcome Cohort Study
• Disease is expected to occur in future
• Development of disease in exposed and non exposed compared
• Time consuming and difficult to carry out.
• Suitable for common disease
• Expensive
• Dropout rate higher
• Can have multiple outcome

Experimental Studies
• Investigator can “control” the exposure similar to laboratory experiments except living populations are the subjects
• generally involves random assignment to groups

• the ultimate step in testing causal hypotheses
• clinical trials are the most well known experimental design

Experimental Studies
• Experimental studies are stronger in determining the etiology of disease than descriptive studies.
• Treatment and exposures occur in a “controlled” environment.
• planned research designs.
• Community trials use non random data .
• Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)
• A design with subjects randomly assigned to “treatment” and “comparison” groups
• Provides most convincing evidence of relationship between exposure and effect
• Not possible to use RCTs to test effects of exposures that are expected to be harmful, for ethical reasons



Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)
• the “gold standard” of research designs provides most convincing evidence of relationship between exposure and effect.
It is not unexpected to find that observational studies find different results than for clinical trials. For example there have been 100s of observational studies demonstrating that hormone replacement was protective for women. However, when this was put to a clinical trail, the surprising result was that hormone replacement was not protective
Randomized Controlled Trials
Disadvantages
• Very expensive
• Not appropriate to answer certain types of questions
• it may be unethical, for example, to assign persons to certain treatment or comparison groups
Field Trails (randomized uncontrolled)
1.Preventive trials: It is used to estimate the effect of preventive techniques
2.Risk factor trials: It is used when specific risk factors are prevented in groups of populations, like dietary pattern.

Community trials(non-randomized controlled
Such studies are the only way in which a general intervention like fluoridation has to be tried out for reducing dental caries. Control communities in the neighborhood can be selected for comparison

Ethical issues
Basic Principles of ethics when practicing epidemiology .
1. All proposals for epidemiological studies should be submitted to institutional ethics committees before start working.
2. Epidemiologist must respect personal privacy and confidentiality at all times
3. Informed consent must be obtained from participants in studies and they must retain the right to withdraw at any time.


المادة المعروضة اعلاه هي مدخل الى المحاضرة المرفوعة بواسطة استاذ(ة) المادة . وقد تبدو لك غير متكاملة . حيث يضع استاذ المادة في بعض الاحيان فقط الجزء الاول من المحاضرة من اجل الاطلاع على ما ستقوم بتحميله لاحقا . في نظام التعليم الالكتروني نوفر هذه الخدمة لكي نبقيك على اطلاع حول محتوى الملف الذي ستقوم بتحميله .